Rantings of a sub-editor

December 15, 2011

Self-bribery and small insanities

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 11:12 am

I am terrible at working at home. Really. It sounds nice, right? Pyjamas are accepted workwear, there’s tea and coffee on tap and there are no colleagues biting their nails, humming, grunting or doing any of the other things colleagues do. But, left to my own procrastinations and insanities, I am next to useless. Give me an office and its corresponding code of sane conduct any day. For me, working from home is a slow spiral into absurdity.

It starts off simply:

  • When you get to the end of the page, you can make a cup of tea. Fair.
  • After the first ten pages, you can make coffee. Ooh, kerr-azy!
  • You can look at Twitter once every five pages.
  • Potato goes in the oven at 11.30am, not before, and then you come back here and do another half hour while it bakes.

Gets sillier:

  • Finish page 12, and you can put on Boombastic and dance around pretending to be Shaggy.
  • No Irish Rover until page 15.
  • Yes, you can take a five-minute break to pluck your eyebrows, seeing as it’s clearly urgent. But two more pages first.
  • No Lambada until page 20.
  • What’s that? You have a pressing urge to look up Delia’s gnocchi recipe? Well it’ll have to wait until page 23.
  • Write a blog post about it all? Oh yes, excellent use of your time. Inspired, really.

Then slowly descends into madness:

  • Freezing, are you? Well you’d better finish that document then. Because the heating’s not going on until you have. But finish that page and you can have a scarf.
  • Period pains? Ha! A thousand small demons scratching at your womb with their claws of broken glass? Tough. You can’t have any more painkillers until you get to page 27. Oh, don’t give me that “I’d work better if I wasn’t in agony” crap.
  • Dinner? Dinner? Ha, like you deserve dinner! WORK FOR IT THEN, SOLDIER. HUP! There’s nothing like a bit of low blood sugar-induced trembling to help you get a wiggle on.

As I write, I am wearing fleece polka-dot trousers (tucked into my socks) with, for reasons I’m not entirely sure of, a woollen skirt over the top. Then, a stripy jumper, an aqua dressing gown over that, and – for the pièce de résistance – I have used the dressing gown belt to strap a hot-water bottle to my belly. The glamour of the overall look is quite simply astounding.

On the plus side, there’s the view from my desk.
The view I never tire of

May 17, 2011

You know you want me

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 10:50 am
Tags: , , ,

I’m going freelance in mid June, so I thought I’d cheekily post this here to see if anyone knew of any work going, or – better still – is looking for a damn good sub.

There are so many things I’d like to do, and the direction that I take will inevitably be influenced by the work available. I love subbing, I’d like to have a bash at copywriting, and I have a couple of features up my sleeve that I want to write. I’d also like to get a fantastic job on a national. Or write a bestselling book. Or, or, or… who knows.

Outside of work, I’ve sub-let a corner of an artists’ studio for the summer, where I’m planning to do things with paint, photographs, cork boards and Polyfilla. I’m starting bikram yoga (yes, the sweaty one) and dance classes. Then there’s my little allotment, which is primed to yield at least three strawberries this year. I also want to do some voluntary work to help old people get out more. Lacking focus? Yes, a bit. But after three years of working significantly more than five days a week, I seem to have an appetite to do everything, all at once. I am, however, wondering what I’m going to live on. Just a small fly in the ointment, that.

And so.

Here’s why you should want me:
I work stupidly hard
I know my stuff
I’m a perfectionist, obviously…
… but I’m also fast
I write nicely (look at my blog posts)
I edit sensitively and carefully
I’m a nice person to have around
I’m equally happy on the web and in print
If we agree on a booking, I won’t let you down
I can tell you what the dot above a ‘i’ is (a tittle)
I may bring homegrown strawberries to the office (three)

And here’s my CV, in miniature:
Sub-editor at Which? from June 2010 to present
Freelance weekend sub-editor at the Guardian and The Sunday Times from March 2010 to present
Deputy chief sub-editor at The Grocer from December 2008 to June 2010
Sub-editor at The Grocer from March 2008 to December 2008
English language teacher in England, Japan and Italy from 2004 to 2008
Tomato picker, waitress, organic farmer, Body Shop label unpeeler, bartender, Charlie Chalk dresser upper, estate agent’s dogsbody, town planning clerk, social services switchboard operator, mental health centre worker, cake wrapper and seedling nurturer (not all at once, I’m not that good) from 1996 to 2004

I can sub, write, edit and copywrite (and play one whole chord on the mandolin). If you have anything else in mind, or if you want to see my proper CV, ask me. I’m available from Monday 13th June, my email address is cathyrelf@hotmail.com and I’m @substuff on Twitter.

I live in Brighton, and am more than happy to travel to London. I can also work from home. I’m flexible about hours etc, as long as they’re within times when the trains run. Rates are negotiable depending on the work, hours and location.

Other than that, this blog contains 18 months’ worth of musings and probably tells you everything you need to know about me. Come and get me, tigers.

If you’ve worked with me and want to help me out by telling employers why they should hire me, please add a comment below. I will repay you with my eternal gratitude (and beer, of course).

February 10, 2011

The leather-bound notebook

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 4:57 pm

Smells like holiday

I am very excited. This is partly because at lunchtime I went out and spent a ridiculous (calm down, not that ridiculous) amount of money on a leather-bound notebook of great beauty. It’s A4, with thick plain paper inside and a soft brown cover. And a ribbon.

Why?

Because last night, on the edge of sleep, I had a brainwave.

Before I explain the brainwave (the genius of which will undoubtably mean you need a lie-down afterwards, so be prepared), I should first explain the problem to which it is a solution. Are you with me?

Now, I live in Brighton and work in London. That takes up 6am-7.30pm of my life every day. I also do some weekend shifts, mainly Saturdays at The Sunday Times. And I write a blog, take part in a news group, go out with friends, see my family, cook, clean, launder, iron (okay, pretty much lying now), go to the gym (now definitely lying) and cajole builders into fixing my crumbling flat (oh but it’s listed and so pretty – who minds a rotting rafter or three?). For the past year, I’ve been using my holiday allowance to take days off after doing weekend shifts – as a result, apart from four days last June between leaving The Grocer and starting at Which?, I haven’t had a holiday – as in several consecutive days off –  since July 2009.

I am not complaining. I’ve created this situation myself, I’m happy and I love being busy. I’m also sure there are many people who are far busier. I am very lucky - I have a good job, a lovely (if somewhat mouldy) home and some quite frankly sterling people around me. But… there are other things I would like to do, for which I don’t have time and haven’t had time for – ooh – three years.

I accept that in making an effort to succeed in one field, you have to be prepared to make compromises in another. That’s fine. But it’s a tough balance, and I’m not sure I always get it right.

I would like to have time to paint. I’m reasonably good at it, don’t you know. I would like to write (non-grammar and non-household-appliance things, shock horror). And I would like to take my camera on long, rambling walks. Preferably barefoot, with silver rings on my toes and flowers in my hair, though I admit that part may prove not to be practical.

For various reasons, this has been bothering me more of late. And after a particularly agitated few days, I had a small epiphany last night. I am going to take a holiday. Yeeees.

I am going to take a week off, but stay in Brighton. Including the weekends, that’s nine days. I will treat each day (9am-6pm) as a working day, but only work on the things I want to. From 8-8.30am, I will go for that run I never have time for. From 1-3pm, like the Spanish, I will take a long lunch break, meet up with friends, perhaps have a massage (erm and visit the dentist and optician, yay). Like Bill Gates, I will check my emails only once a day (Facebook, Twitter, WordPress, Flickr). In fact, I will touch the computer only once a day. IN FACT, I will conduct as much of the above as possible outside of my flat (hotbed of distraction that it is).

Hence the beautiful leather-bound notebook. It’ll be fun. Roll on 26th March!

December 23, 2010

Me, me, me (and a book)

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 3:24 pm

Firstly, merry Christmas!

Secondly, and, hehe, more importantly, let’s talk about me. I need a little advice.

A few people have suggested that I “get the blog published as a book”. I’m very flattered by this, and more than willing. However, I have no bloody idea how to go about it, or even what exactly I have to offer. So if anyone has any suggestions, advice or information, I’d be grateful to hear it.

I think the main things I need to consider are:

What would it be?

A grammar guide? A style guide? A how-to-write guide? Or not a guide at all – a series of rantings (similar to some of what I have written on the blog, but more polished)? An illustrated gift book with humorous tips? I’ve tried to do a bit of all of these on my blog, but I’m not really sure where to focus. Or what length I should be looking at. Or how deep to go.

Who is it for?

I have some quite strong opinions on this point. What I don’t like about some existing books on good writing is the haughty tone that they take, and the inaccessibility. If I were to write a book, I would like it to be one that most people could understand. That means no Latin, no assumptions of cultural knowledge or level of education, no long and unfathomable quotations.

I’ve read plenty of books on writing, and some of them make me feel stupid. I’m not stupid, and neither is anyone else with enough love for language to spend their time finding out more about it, I must assume. So I don’t want to write anything that makes anyone feel stupid. Ever.

Getting more specific, would it be for journalists? Sub-editors? Students? General interest? A stocking-filler gift?

Erm… how to do it?

Yeah… that’s the biggest question of all. I could make the time, by writing during my commute. That’s fifteen usable hours per week. But where do you start? Do you contact a publisher first and pitch them an idea? Or write first and then pitch? Or…?

As you can see, it’s an idea that really is in its earliest infancy. I don’t have any contacts in the world of publishing, or know anyone who has successfully had a book published. For all my ranting, at the end of the day I am just a lass from Bognor Regis (aww) and it’s all very well telling me to publish a book, but… how? So, if anyone fancies giving me their tuppence worth, I’d be glad to hear it! Here’s your chance to help mould my new year’s resolutions.

While I’m on the subject, last year I resolved to:

  • Give up alcohol and sugar for January (achieved, with a few wobbles)
  • Get a new job (I left The Grocer for Which? in June: achieved)
  • Do some national newspaper shifts (yep, I’ve done quite a few at The Sunday Times and the Guardian, and a couple on The Times supplements: achieved)
  • Become a lean, mean yoga goddess (erm, well… there’s always next year)

So, overall, woop!

For bonus woops, the Guardian’s Mind Your Language folks have listed Rantingsubs as a “site we like” (down there on the right-hand side), Wordsworks put it at number three on its 12 links of Christmas and Emphasis has asked me to write some (paid, yeah!) guest blog posts.

I’ve been writing the blog for more than a year now, and am shocked and delighted to say that it’s had more than 25,000 hits. Thank you to everyone who has read my ramblings, commented on posts, corrected me (usually gently, sometimes brutally), argued with me/one another, sent me material (Andy, Mum, Vince) and generally participated in the geekiness. Thanks too to the excellent guest writers who joined in the fun – and if anyone else would like to have a rant, get in touch. Thank you specifically to Kit and Pete, without whose prompting and poking I would certainly not be considering writing a book, and who have gone out of their respective ways to open doors for me. Even if one of them spells petfood as a single word and the other plays fast and loose with his whiches and thats.

Write a book? Sure, I’m game. So, er, what do I do again?

August 10, 2010

Did the monument move for you, darling?

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 12:55 pm
I am a bad, bad person for writing this post. But… oh dear me.
My email:

Hi [name],

[Name] wanted the intro changed to make the link with the ad in the picture more explicit. I’ve changed it to the following – can you check that you’re happy with this? I’ve moved the bit about its size into the next par, also below.

Cinema ads for the TZ10 feature the 12Mp camera showing off its 12x zoom and terrific wide-angle lens by capturing an ancient Egyptian statue of Anubis coming to life. And although no monuments moved when we tried it, we weren’t disappointed.

The zoom starts from a wide angle of 25mm, which is exceptional for a camera just 3.5cm thick. This is useful for taking photos of groups of people, as it allows you to fit more into your shots without having to stand back from the action.

Thanks,

Cathy

And the reply (which, following a phone conversation to check, I have ascertained was not a joke) came thus:

Hi Cathy, it looks fine to me.

Only question I’d ask – but this is pernickety – is why would people expect us to be disappointed that monuments didn’t move when we tried it?

How about: We were unable to recreate the moving monuments in our tests, but we were very pleased with the camera’s overall performance.

Thanks,

[name]

Oh. My. God.

 

July 7, 2010

Subs on stage

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 10:53 am

Excellent! My first choice of fantasy performance still remains The Grocer The Musical, but until such time, I am more than content with this. Yes, someone’s made a play about subs: http://www.cocktaverntheatre.com/subs.html

June 15, 2010

Sudden silence

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 8:57 pm

Apologies folks, I have dropped off the planet for a little while! I was on holiday last week, enjoying the fine rain of the west country. And now I am just getting used to working at Which? and my new and gigantic commute, which is leaving me a little short of time. Meanwhile, my American friend is staying with me at the moment and I keep noticing lots of funny language differences but not having time to write them down. Must remember for future writings!

In the words of the great Mr Schwarzenegger, I’ll be back.

June 7, 2010

Error message to the rescue

Filed under: the Guardian — substuff @ 6:58 am
Tags: , ,

Well it was my third shift at the Guardian yesterday, and I continue in fine form. The main excitement on this occasion was caused by a small button called “send to walls”  - or, rather, by me pressing it. Thank God it didn’t work.

I only subbed one web story yesterday, which is here. And I think it’s fair to say I made a right meal of it! Not the copy, which I am assured was fine. Not even the web only/print only bit. It was the photo that tripped me up on this occasion.

Now when you add a picture to a web story, you are given the option to crop it. You do so, and afterwards you are given the option to upload it. There may be a way of uploading it without doing the crops first, but if there is, I don’t know it.

Things were a little hazy in my memory, it having been a couple of weeks since I was shown how to do the web part of it, and my notes weren’t making a lot of sense to me. But the bit that really confused me was that I had chosen a photo that I didn’t think needed cropping. So I stuck it on the form, filled in the caption and the alternative text, did the credits… and… I figured that was ready to go.

So there I am, with my completed web form and my completed story, and I have three options at the bottom. One is “add crops”, but I’ve misguidedly decided I don’t need to do this. One is “edit”. One is “send to walls”. Well this seems the only logical option for sending the picture to the web story (no? it has the word “send” in it at least!) so I choose that one. I’m rewarded with an error message saying there are rights restrictions on the picture.

So to the art desk I go, and from there am sent to the web art desk upstairs where I explain somewhat ineptly what the problem is (or in fact what the problem isn’t). We look at the details on the pic, ascertain that there’s nothing wrong there.

“I just don’t understand what you’re clicking that would bring up that error message,” says the man.

“It’s when I click ‘send to walls’,” I say. “It just won’t let me go further than that.”

“‘Send to walls’?” He looks at me as if I have just pulled out a gun. “But that means send to the walls. Of the building. You can’t do that. You shouldn’t have the option to do that.”

Ah. Those gigantic screens on the outside of the building.

There follows a patient and detailed explanation of what I should have done, of which I understand about word in every three and try to convey the impression that it is more like two words in every three. Sixty percent of my brain is busy begging the ground – or at least the third floor – to swallow me, you see. As I make my retreat, I get the distinct impression he is phoning the local straitjacket provider.

I’ve never had much room in my heart for error messages, but today, just this once, I am sending them all a little hug.

May 29, 2010

Tsk, bad sub!

I am back at the Sunday Times for my second shift. And the good news is that I have been signed up for more shifts… It seems I am, as they say, “in”.

The bad news is that I did slightly disgrace myself last week (although apparently otherwise did well).

In a story about the BA strikes, I made a change to save a line.

The original said:

“to avert 15 days of strikes”

And I changed it to:

“to avert a 15-day strike”

Except, I was wrong. Because it didn’t mean 15 consecutive days – it meant 15 days in total, but split into separate periods. Luckily, there were no complaints, but… I hang my head (again).

May 26, 2010

Changes to comments

Filed under: Substuff says... — substuff @ 10:57 am

Hello there everyone, just a quick note.

Firstly, thank you to everyone who contributes to the blog with comments and observations – and please don’t stop.

I’ve just changed the rules on commenting so that you have to input an email address. Most of you do this anyway, but to those who don’t, I promise I’m not going to sign you up to any awful mailing lists or anything. I’ve changed it for the simple reason that I am getting some unwelcome messages (who’d have thought a grammar blog would warrant it?), which isn’t very pleasant. Requiring an email address won’t prevent it, but it will mean I can block people from being able to comment again if necessary.

It’s not serious hate mail. The last couple of weeks have yielded:

“funny. not”

“this blog is a waste of time”

“please stop bloging, the internet is bored with it!!!!”

The first response that springs to mind is “well, don’t read it then, idiot”. But still, it’s annoying.

Somehow I suspect it will happen less frequently when the person/persons concerned have to provide an email address.

But it’s not all bad news. I have discovered I can make you all appear as little monsters, unless you already have a picture.

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers